Skip links and keyboard navigation

    7.4 Cabinet material not suitable for proactive release

    Where Cabinet has approved that a submission for proactive release, it is important to ensure that information not suitable for release is redacted prior to publication of the submission.

    The department that led drafting of the submission (the lead agency) is responsible for coordinating redaction of any information which is not suitable for release in accordance with the criteria and considerations in Table 1. It is the responsibility of the lead agency to ensure all necessary consultation is undertaken with other agencies as part of the redaction process.

    All material proposed for proactive release must undergo a thorough and consistent review process. Redactions must remove only information not suitable for release in accordance with the redaction criteria and considerations at Table 1.

    Impact Analysis Statements are not subject to the application of redaction criteria.

    Table 1

    Redaction Criteria (Code)

    Considerations

    Executive Government (01)

    Disclosure would reveal previous Cabinet deliberations that were prior to 25 March 2024 or previous deliberations made on or after 25 March 2024 that may have been determined as exempt from proactive release.

    Disclosure would reveal information about ongoing Cabinet deliberations (i.e. decisions not yet finalised).

    Disclosure would reveal information that has been specifically created for provision to Executive Council e.g. Executive Council Schedule.

    Constitutional conventions (02)

    Disclosure would breach constitutional conventions, including but not limited to:

    • Individual and collective ministerial responsibility (e.g. comments between Ministers or reference to specific Minister’s positions);
    • The political neutrality of officials;
    • The free and frank expression of opinions (objective, expert or evidence-based advice or analysis provided by Ministers or any public service agency should be redacted if disclosure would be contrary to collective ministerial responsibility);
    • Communications with or regarding the sovereign
    • The independence of the judiciary or interference with judicial processes.

    Intergovernmental relations (03)

    Disclosure would prejudice the state’s relations with another government, including by revealing active discussions at National Cabinet or Ministerial Councils.

    Disclosure would reveal information provided in confidence by another government.

    Risk of serious damage to the economy (04)

    Disclosure would reveal information which has been created in the course of the State’s budgetary process.

    Disclosure would risk serious damage to the economy.

    Disclosure would risk information being used for improper gain or advantage.

    Contempt of court or Parliament or prohibited by Act (05)

    Disclosure would infringe the privileges of Parliament, the Parliament of the Commonwealth or a State, or a House of such a Parliament or the Legislative Assembly of Norfolk Island.

    Disclosure of information would be contempt of court.

    Disclosure would be contrary to an order made or direction given by a royal commission, commission of inquiry or another appropriate body having power to take evidence on oath.

    Disclosure or publication is prohibited by another State or Commonwealth Act.

    Legal professional privilege (06)

    Information is subject to legal professional privilege.

    Potential civil or criminal liability (07)

    The information may result in potential liability, civil or criminal. Matters to be considered include, but are not limited to:

    • Individual privacy - Personal information, including that which is subject to the Information Privacy Act 2009. Disclosure of personal information of natural persons, including that of the deceased natural persons. This extends to information regarding a person’s family and marital relationships, health or ill health, relationships and emotional ties with other people and domestic responsibilities or financial obligations.
    • Defamation – If the information proposed for release says or does something that may potentially harm the reputation of another person, group, or organisation.

    Breach of confidence (08)

     

    Disclosure would constitute a breach of the Information Privacy Act 2009.

    Disclosure would reveal information that is commercial in confidence.

    Disclosure would represent a breach of confidence including information received in confidence from another organisation or relates to another organisations interests.

    Disclosure of commercially sensitive information would be a breach of contract or copyright.

    Disclosure would adversely affect ongoing negotiations with a third party.

    Security and Law Enforcement (09)

    Disclosure could:

    • Damage the security of the State or Commonwealth
    • Impact on the effectiveness of law enforcement efforts
    • Prejudice an ongoing investigation by a government agency
    • Prejudice a person’s fair trial or the impartial adjudication of a case.
    • Endanger a person’s life or physical safety, including being subject to harassment or intimidation.
    • Endanger the security of a building, structure or vehicle; prejudice a system or procedure for the protection of persons, property or the environment; or prejudice the wellbeing of a cultural or natural resource or the habitat of animals or plants.
    • Prejudice the confidentiality of information sources.

    The lead agency is responsible for seeking legal advice where necessary to determine if information in a submission should be redacted prior to release.

    Each separate redaction should have all relevant redaction codes listed against any redacted information. Where an entire attachment is not suitable for release, it should be replaced with a page with the Attachment’s number and the relevant redaction code/s referenced.

    Once a submission has been prepared for proactive release, the lead department should ensure that all metadata has been removed from the document.

    ^ to top

    Last updated:
    12 June, 2024
    Last reviewed:
    22 March, 2024